首页> 外文会议>2005 TAPPI engineering, pulping, environmental conference >SOFTWOOD BLEACHING PRACTICES INCANADA: ANALYSIS OF THE 2003PAPTAC BLEACHING COMMITTEE “BESTPRACTICES” SURVEY
【24h】

SOFTWOOD BLEACHING PRACTICES INCANADA: ANALYSIS OF THE 2003PAPTAC BLEACHING COMMITTEE “BESTPRACTICES” SURVEY

机译:加拿大的针叶木漂白做法:2003年PAPTAC漂白委员会“最佳做法”调查分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

ECF bleaching is now firmly established in Canada. Bleachedrnkraft pulp mills are no longer concerned with the transition to chlorine dioxide-based bleaching, but with optimization of chemical consumption and cost reduction.rnSince the last survey in 1999, softwood bleach plants haverndecreased total chlorine dioxide use by 5%. However, thernkappa number of the pulp entering the bleach plant has alsorndecreased: by 8% for oxygen-delignified softwood, and byrn7% for “conventional” softwood (I.e. without oxygenrndelignification). Furthermore, hydrogen peroxide use hasrnincreased by 13%. This means that although pulp mills arernsending less lignin into the bleach plant, they are actually using 5-6% more oxidizing chemical per unit of lignin, and to reach a lower final brightness than before.rnHowever, more detailed analysis of the data showed that most of these changes are primarily due to mills with “high” relative chemical consumption, especially in the case of the conventionally-delignified softwood bleach plants. When the mills were sorted and grouped by their overall Sequence Kappa Factor (the relative amount of ClO2 and H2O2 used in bleaching), there are clear differences between the “low” and “high” relative chemical consumption mills. For conventional softwood mills, the low relative consumptionrngroup had an average Sequence Kappa Factor of 0.34,rnessentially unchanged since the last survey, while the highrnrelative consumption mills have increased their SequencernKappa Factor by 8% to 0.44. For mills producing oxygendelignifiedrnsoftwood, both groups have increased their relativernchemical use by 9%: the low relative consumption averagernSequence Kappa Factor has increased to 0.42, while that of thernhigh relative consumption group has increased to 0.57.rnThese differences between the two groups equate to anrnaverage bleaching cost advantage of more than $5/BADMtrn(bleached, air-dry metric tonne of pulp) for the low relativernconsumption conventional softwood mills, and a costrnadvantage of more than $7/BADMt for the low relativernconsumption mills with O2 delignification. This is not due torna lower bleach feed kappa number; in fact, the low relativernconsumption mills with oxygen delignification bleach a pulprnwith 1-point higher kappa number on average, and the lowrnrelative consumption conventional softwood mills bleach arnpulp with an average 3-point higher kappa number, eachrncompared to the high relative consumption groups.rnFor each pulp type, one of the key differences between the tworngroups is a low Kappa Factor in the first bleaching stage forrnthe low relative consumption mills. This correlation isrnespecially strong for the conventional softwood mills. Inrnaddition, analysis of the relative amount of chlorine dioxidernused for pulp brightening, compared to the post-Eop-stagernkappa number, and the pH control strategies in the D1 stage,rnsuggest that the high relative consumption mills mayrnexperience more carryover from the Eop stage washer into thernD1 stage.rnOverall, the following additional trends have also beenrnobserved since 1999:rn? More bleach plants with on-line Kappa Analyzers; 75% ofrnmills with oxygen delignification and 50% ofrnconventional lines now have Kappa Analyzers. However,rnthey are not yet being fully-utilized; less than 50% ofrnmills are using some form of Kappa Factor Control in thernD0 stage, and many mills are still controlling the D1 stagernmanually.rn? An increase in the D0 stage Kappa Factor from 0.22 torn0.26 for bleach plants processing oxygen-delignifiedrnsoftwood.rn? An increase in Eop pressure for bleach plants withoutrnoxygen delignification.rn? More high-shear mixers have been installed in Eop stages,rnand in bleach plants which previously used MC pumps forrnD1 stage ClO2 mixing.rn? Final brightness has decreased by about one point.rnOn average, bleached softwood kraft pulp mills haverndecreased the kappa number of the pulp entering the bleachrnplant, and have also decreased the final brightness of the pulprnleaving the bleach plant, but have not proportionally decreasedrnchemical use, despite the installation of more equipment andrntechnology to decrease chemical consumption. In 1999, thernsurvey team reported a slight increase in the Sequence KapparnFactor since the 1996 survey, and this trend has surprisingly continued.
机译:ECF漂白现已在加拿大牢固确立。漂白牛皮纸制浆厂不再关注向二氧化氯漂白的过渡,而是优化了化学消耗量并降低了成本。自1999年进行上次调查以来,软木漂白剂工厂已将二氧化氯的总使用量减少了5%。但是,进入漂白厂的纸浆的卡伯值也降低了:氧脱木素的软木降低了8%,“常规”软木(即没有氧脱木素的降低)了7%。此外,过氧化氢的使用增加了13%。这意味着尽管制浆厂向漂白厂中投入的木质素较少,但实际上每单位木​​质素使用的氧化化学物质要高出5-6%,并达到比以前更低的最终白度。然而,对数据进行的更详细分析表明:这些变化中的大多数主要归因于相对化学消耗量较高的工厂,特别是在常规去木质的针叶漂白植物的情况下。当按工厂的总体序列Kappa因子(漂白中使用的ClO2和H2O2的相对量)对工厂进行分类和分组时,“低”和“高”相对化学消耗工厂之间存在明显差异。对于常规的针叶木厂,低相对消耗量组的平均序列Kappa因子为0.34,自上次调查以来基本保持不变,而相对高消耗量的组将其SequencernKappa因子增加了8%,为0.44。对于生产氧脱木素软木的工厂,两组的相对化学用量均增加了9%:较低的相对消耗平均值rn序列Kappa系数增加到0.42,而相对消耗较高的组的相对Kappa系数增加到0.57。两组之间的这些差异等于平均漂白。低相对消耗量的常规软木纸浆厂的成本优势超过5美元/ BADMtrn(漂白,风干公吨纸浆),而低氧消耗量的传统软木厂的成本优势超过7美元/ BADMt。这不是由于torna漂白剂的Kappa值较低;实际上,具有氧去木质素的相对消耗量低的造纸厂漂白平均卡伯值高1点的纸浆,而相对消耗量低的常规软木工厂则将平均浆粕的Kappa值高3点的漂白纸浆,每一个都与较高的相对消耗量组相比。对于每种纸浆类型,这两个组之间的主要差异之一是在低相对消耗工厂的第一漂白阶段中的低卡伯系数。对于传统的软木厂,这种相关性特别强。此外,分析与纸浆后阶段的kappa数相比,用于纸浆增白的二氧化氯的相对量,以及D1阶段的pH控制策略,这建议高相对消耗量工厂可能会经历更多的从纸浆阶段洗衣机进入纸浆的残留总的来说,自1999年以来还观察到以下附加趋势:配备在线Kappa分析仪的更多漂白厂;现在,有75%的氧气脱木素工厂和50%的常规生产线都配备了Kappa分析仪。但是,它们尚未得到充分利用。不到50%的工厂在rnD0阶段使用某种形式的Kappa Factor Control,而许多工厂仍在手动控制D1阶段。对于处理氧脱木素软木的漂白植物,D0阶段Kappa系数从0.22增至0.26。无氧脱木素作用的漂白厂的操作压力增加。在Eop级和漂白厂中安装了更多的高剪切混合机,以前使用MC泵进行D1级ClO2混合。最终白度降低了大约1个百分点。平均而言,漂白的针叶木牛皮纸制浆厂降低了进入漂白厂的纸浆的卡伯值,并且也降低了离开漂白厂的纸浆的最终白度,但是尽管使用化学用量没有按比例降低安装更多的设备和技术以减少化学消耗。自1999年调查以来,Thernsurvey小组报告说,Sequence KapparnFactor有所增加,并且这一趋势出人意料地继续了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号